April Global Composite PMI plunged to 26.5, the lowest in the index’s 22-year history and significantly below the 36.8 recorded during the global financial crisis. PMI data for individual countries have also crashed to their lowest since 2009. Of the PMI components, new orders, overseas orders and employment registered the sharpest drops, reflecting weak domestic demand, contraction in global trade, and falling purchasing power. Despite signs of a recovery after easing lockdown measures, the coronavirus crisis will leave economic scars such as high unemployment and rising debt. Even before the Covid-19 pandemic, global debt had hit a new high of 322% of GDP in 3Q 2019, with total debt reaching USD253trn, according to the Institute of International Finance (IFF). Rising global debts were led by non-financial corporate and government sectors. The Covid-19 impact would push up debt levels, which would dampen private sector (future) spending and delay an economic recovery.
Total debt in the US has continued to rise, led by credit to government and non-financial corporates. The CBO estimates federal government debt would increase from 80% of GDP in 2019 to 101% this fiscal year and 108% next year due to stimulus programs. Meanwhile, the shift in the Fed’s policy - from buying Treasuries to corporate bonds - reflects a vulnerable corporate sector. Credit rating downgrades would lead to a larger proportion of speculative grade debts, which would escalate risks to financial stability. By rating category, non-financial corporate debt is the largest at 77% of total debt, led by BBB-rated debts. Rising government and corporate debts – if left unchecked – could delay economic recovery after the US reopens its economy.
Eurozone GDP shrank by 3.8% QoQ and 3.3% YoY in 1Q20, the sharpest decline since 1995. GDP for major EU countries also contracted sharply, including Italy (-4.7%), France (-5.8%), Spain (-5.2%) and Germany (-2.2%). And this only reflects less than one month of lockdown (since mid-March). Markit PMI data has hit new lows in April. Manufacturing PMI dropped to 30.5 in Spain and 31.1 in Italy. Non-manufacturing index plunged deeper to 7.1 in Spain and 10.2 in France, implying great pressure on the services sector. Economic confidence index has dropped to its lowest, led by services (-35) and industrial (-30.4) due to forced closures and lower household spending. The outlook for the EU economy is worse in 2Q20 and the crisis could extend if the pandemic is not contained soon.
After several countries started to ease lockdown measures, economic activity such as electricity consumption, has been picking up, albeit slowly. The large monetary stimulus has injected liquidity into the banking sector, leading to a loosening of financial conditions. However, troubles in peripheral countries, especially Italy and Spain, continue to pressure their economies and the region. Bond yield spreads between Italy and Germany have widened since the pandemic started, which limits fiscal policy space. In addition, Germany’s judges recently ruled that the QE program is not backed by EU treaties, raising questions about future monetary stimulus. The limited policy space could hinder the region’s growth prospects.
The pace of economic recovery could be markedly different between countries, depending on how well they contain the Covid-19 outbreak, and their respective economic fundamentals and policy space. The pandemic would leave countries with high unemployment as well as surging debts. Even before Covid-19, debt outstanding in this region had been high, led by non-financial corporate debts (110% of GDP) and government debts (100% of GDP). While rising government debt is led by Italy, its government bonds are also held by other EU countries, implying risks could spread across the region. Private sector debt is another concern, with rising funding costs. The pandemic, structural problems (with high and rising debts), and limited policy space in periphery countries could cause this region’s economic recovery to trail behind other major countries, particularly the US and China.
1Q20 GDP is expected to shrink by -0.7% QoQ, following a -1.9% QoQ drop in 4Q19. This implies the economy is technically in a recession. March unemployment rate is the highest since March 2019, at 2.5%, and job-to-applicant ratio is at the lowest since September 2016. The economy is likely to get worse in 2Q20, after the PM declared a state of emergency on 7 April and extended it to 31 May. In April, consumer confidence index plunged to a new low of 21.6, suggesting a drop in private consumption ahead. Hence, 2Q20 GDP could see a larger contraction of -11.9% QoQ. Although Japan is likely to ease lockdown measures in 2H20, economic recovery would be slow due to (i) elevated unemployment, which would hurt purchasing power, and (ii) sluggish business investment following weak global trade and bankruptcy risks. And despite subdued economic activities, loan demand had soared recently, indicating tight liquidity in the business sector. Besides, the credit guarantee program is insufficient (only 5% of total loans outstanding) and the program has been delayed. For the whole of 2020, the economy could see a deep contraction. The BOJ projects 2020 GDP growth at between-5.0% and -3.0%, the slowest in 11 years or since the Global Financial Crisis.
The Bank of Japan (BOJ) is shifting its policy focus from reflation to battling the crisis to support the affected corporate and household sectors. At the April meeting, the BOJ stepped up monetary stimulus, including (i) tripling the size of corporate bond and commercial paper purchases, and (ii) accepting household debt as collateral for lending to commercial banks. Before the Covid-19 pandemic, non-financial corporate debts had reached 103.9% of GDP. The adverse impact of Covid-19 is liquidity shortage, which could cause highly-leveraged firms to go bankrupt. Corporate bond spreads have also widened due to perceived greater default risk. A Bloomberg article claims the existing fiscal measure would boost GDP growth by only 1.1 ppt and thus, Japan needs additional stimulus. Since Japan’s public debt (238% of GDP in 2019) is relatively higher than in other major economies, its fiscal space is limited. Looking ahead, Krungsri Research projects the BOJ would continue to channel its resources to battling the crisis by providing more liquidity for corporate and household sectors to prevent insolvencies.
1Q20 GDP data show the hospitality, construction, trade and transportation sectors had been hit hard by the COVID-19 pandemic. Industrial profit to revenue ration has fallen from 5.9 in December to 3.9 in March, far below pre-Covid level. Despite easing lockdown measures, China’s supply side economy continues to see a slow recovery mainly due to weak domestic demand and sharp drop in exports. April data also indicate the manufacturing sector has deteriorated again, after picking up in March. The official Manufacturing PMI data dropped to 50.8 and Caixin Manufacturing PMI has dropped to 49.4. The weaker manufacturing production was driven by a plunge in new export orders because Covid-19 has hurt global demand. The sluggish recovery would leave unemployment rate above pre-Covid-19 level. Urban unemployment rate had risen from 5.2% in December to 5.9% in March. Some migrant workers have yet to return to work in the cities, leading to less than 80% of work resuming in some cities (as of 7 April), including Guangzhou 77%, Beijing 68%, and Wuhan 38%.
To accelerate economic recovery, China’s economy required a large liquidity injection to offset the liquidity drain. This led the PBOC to make the unprecedented move to apply an accommodative monetary policy by cutting reserve requirement ratio and interest rates. The supply of government bonds has surged following the fiscal stimulus ,and there will be more to come. Credit has expanded across the board, not only bank loans but also bond and equity issuances, which raised money supply (M2) by 10.1% in March. Noticeably, lower policy rates have transmitted to market interest rates, as 3-month SHIBOR has dropped, following a cut in the 7-day reverse repo rate. On its fiscal stance, local government bond issuances have surged since the beginning of 2020, to boost demand through infrastructure investment. The synchronized monetary and fiscal stimulus could rebuild sufficient liquidity to support a sustained recovery.
In China, credit to non-financial corporate sector has reached 149.3% of GDP, although this has dropped moderately following strict regulations since 2017 to contain risky lending. Nonetheless, the large corporate credit could expose higher default risk in the wake of coronavirus pandemic. After the outbreak of COVID-19, not only has public enterprise debt risen, but also debt in the non-financial corporate sector. Moreover, yield spreads between AA-rated and AAA-rated bonds have widened. Tight liquidity could escalate corporate bond defaults; total corporate bonds in defaults have reached CNY30.4bn in the first four months of 2020, compared to CNY140bn for all of 2019. Meanwhile, household debt could increase following a drop in income and rising unemployment. Looking ahead, China’s economic recovery could be derailed by mounting private debt, rising unemployment, and external headwinds, especially weak global demand and the new round of China-US trade tension.
A wide range of economic activities has been halted
Economic recession and negative inflation put pressure on the MPC to cut policy rate
Covid-19 crisis increases household economic vulnerability
The number of new Covid-19 cases in Thailand has dropped to zero recently and the government has started to ease lockdown measures. This has fueled hopes of an economic recovery. Passenger throughput at Thai airports has rebounded slightly. The SET Index has risen above 1,200 points after touching a low of 969. The Thai baht has appreciated since mid-April. However, these signs are insufficient to indicate a sustainable economic recovery and there are permanent economic scars such as high unemployment, weaker purchasing power, high excess capacity, and surging debts.
In Thailand, the rising debt is led by the household sector. This sector will see higher debt levels due to rising unemployment and lost of income due to the Covid-19 pandemic. Pre-pandemic, household debt to GDP had risen to over 3-year high of 80%. Asset quality of consumer loans has deteriorated in almost all segments. Looking ahead, these figures could worsen and make the economy more vulnerable in the longer term.
In Thailand, the number of households totaled 21 million (or 35 million workers). Out of total, 10 million households (or 19.6 million workers) were indebted, accounting for 48% of total households (or 56% of total workers). For low- to medium-income households (earnings less than THB50,000 a month), on average, total expenditure (personal expense plus debt payment) has been higher than income. The segment which found it most difficult to repay debts were households with a monthly income of less than THB10,000, which expenses (excluding debt repayment) normally already exceed their income.
Before the Covid-19 pandemic, non-farm self-employed workers’ total expenditure was already high at 114% of total income, led by self-employed in the rubber and plastic products, computer and electronics, textiles, and motor vehicle sectors. The Covid-19 shock would push up the ratio to 129% of total income, led by accommodation & food services.
The number of employees who have insufficient income to meet monthly expenditure would increase sharply from 6.7mn (38% of total employees) to 8.1mn (46% of total employees) after Covid-19. The number of non-farm self-employed workers in the same situation would rise from 2.8mn (46% of total non-farm self-employed) to 3.8mn (62% of total non-farm self employed).
There are 7.9 million indebted famers in Thailand, accounting for 70% of total farmers (11.4 million). Before the pandemic, indebted farmers’ total expenditure was already high at 132% of total income, led by those involved in vegetables & root (including Cassava), rice producers, and animal products. The Covid-19 shock would increase the ratio by 1ppt to 133% because there will still be demand for agricultural (food) products. But, the drought crisis could hurt rice and cassava producers severely. This would raise total expenditure to 148% of total income due to smaller harvests, especially rice and cassava.
The Covid-19 shock is expected to increase unserviceable household debts by 9% to THB480bn from THB440bn. The sharp increase would be led by self-employed (+17.1%) and employees (+8.6%). For agricultural households, most could not service their debts even before Covid-19. Looking ahead, these households would be vulnerable, which would dampen purchasing power, reduce private spending, and possibly derail economic recovery in Thailand.